The authors of Like a Dragon: Infinite Wealth published a new plot trailer. The video is concentrated around the history of Cazuma Kiryu – the protagonist of most parts Yakuza.
Perhaps for someone the information will be a spoiler below, although it was already mentioned in the previous plot trailer for the game 2 months ago.
Cazuma Kiryu is sick – he found cancer. IN Infinite Wealth Players have to go through this character on the list of things that he wants to do before his death. Kiryu will also meet with old acquaintances and consequences of his past decisions.
Recall that in the new part of the series Yakuza Heroes will be able to walk not only in Japan, but also in the Hawaiian Islands. The developers promise the largest game of all that they did.
Infinite Wealth will be released on January 26, 2024. Platforms – PC, PlayStation and Xbox.
December 11, 2023 Seven times of fields, once cut – see the Garden Life trailer
December 11, 2023 Video with the announcement of Light No Fire became the most viewed trailer with TGA 2023
Yakuza: Like a Dragon – reviews and reviews, description, release date, official website of the game, system requirements and assessments of players | Stopgame
I would suggest that those who are annoying that they are digging that they are digging to unimportant trifles, but these are all the assumptions of course
As a half-hearted, you https://noidverificationcasinos.co.uk/no-kyc-betting/ got to the phrase that does not contradict your words, you are throwing off some unimportant proofs from Vika, which your words do not confirm. But with logic is bad in the gender? Wat?)))
And the review from Halperov will be? And then, it’s sad like that, without a gayden.
Only Gaiden (外伝) is translated as spin-off and/or secret biography
No offense, but you are like the only one who is not at all for this formulation at all
In general, in 4 and 5 there are other protagonists. Well, they are with Kiryukha. Yes
Write Ryu Ga Gotoku in the mail and indicate that if Buhoimonah said, then it should be and nothing else should be
It seems to be sobbing again.
50% of these cases will be occupied by singing the same two songs in karaoke
Completely. There was an enemy whom he could not even defeat.
Wow, by the way, I didn’t know
I am in the know. Wrote only that Kirya is the main character of the series, not the character of most games.
Here it is written that Kiryuha is an original series protagonist. It is not written anywhere that he is the main protagonist … or "Protagonist of the main series"
no one denies that Kiryu is an original protagonist. You just got to the bottom of the wording, they say Kiryu not the protagonist of most games, but the protagonist of the “main series” ..
Well, let’s calculate: Yakuza 0-6, 7 Gaiden and 8-there is Kiryu. Yakuza 7 Light and Darkness (or as the subtitle is translated there in the Japanese version) – Kiryu is not. Total and 10 license plates of the series (if you take Japanese names), Kiryu is in 9, and Ichiban in 2. T.E Kirya is the protagonist of most games of the series
Ichiban is also a “protagonist of the main series” T.K was currently only in one game, which is also the main in the series, and not some spin-off
At least in the zero second, fourth, fifth, well, in Darkon, where Cyry is not at all a playable character
After all, in the Yakuza series of the main characters a lot. If you are not a super literary stuffy, and even when I am still a stuffy, I understand, then you perfectly understand that about everything in everyday life does not share the protagonist and the main character, and there can be many of the latter. Show me a person who knows what a deitegonist is, who are technically secondary playable characters of the Yakudzov series. (Although here you can postcate, because usually the plot in the series is made in such a way that formally the history of the heroes, although connected, is generally independent and, in principle, work as integral works). The vast majority of ordinary people of the main characters and deitegonists do not distinguish. And even if he does not call it, because it will only cause a greater misunderstanding. It’s like being outraged that people do not distinguish a monologue and solidylovy, or even worse – dialogue and polylogue. Not any correction of a formal error for something technically more correctly acceptable in any conditions.
In addition, in the most original article, in principle, there are no actual errors.